The proofing process is crucial for board/card game production, as it involves checking preliminary versions of a printed piece for errors or issues before the full production run.
Traditionally, printed proofs have been the gold standard, but with advancements in printing technology, digital proofs have become increasingly popular.
Now, let’s talk about the differences between digital proofs and printed proofs. These two mainly differ in their production process, quality, efficiency, and price.
Let’s take a closer look!
Table of Contents
Production Process
Firstly, in terms of the production process, digital proofs are much simpler. They use computer software to simulate the product manufacturing process and are then directly printed out using a large-format printer, eliminating tedious steps in traditional proofing, such as film making and proofing.
On the other hand, printed proofs involve a more complex process. It requires creating a film, then plate burning, plate washing, and finally proofing. This process is not only slow but also prone to errors, making corrections troublesome and wasting time and materials.
Quality
Next, let’s discuss quality. The quality of digital proofs mainly depends on the quality of the printer and the adjustment of color management software. If adjusted properly, the colors can closely match the printed product. Additionally, digital proofs have relatively stable quality and don’t require highly skilled operators.
As for printed proofs, their color space is the same as the printed product, resulting in more accurate colors. However, due to the complex process and various influencing factors, color instability may occur, requiring an experienced operator.
Efficiency
Now, let’s talk about efficiency. Digital proofs significantly shorten the product development cycle and improve efficiency due to their simplified process.
Conversely, printed proofs have a longer production cycle, resulting in lower efficiency.
Cost
Lastly, we need to address the cost aspect. Although the initial equipment investment for digital proofs may be higher, it can be more economical in the long run as it reduces intermediate steps and waste. Moreover, the shorter production cycle allows for quick sample turnaround, saving time and costs.
On the other hand, printed proofs incur higher material, equipment, and time costs, and there’s a greater potential for waste. Therefore, it’s crucial to carefully consider these factors when making a choice.
In Summary
Digital proofs and printed proofs have their unique advantages. The best option depends on your specific needs and the context of use.
